|Contact Hours:||3 (NOTE: )|
|Prerequisites:||There are no prerequisites for this course.|
|Corequisites:||There are no corequisites for this course.|
|Catalog Description:||Study of and practice in reasoning and critical thinking in deductive and inductive logic. Techniques the student learns are directly related to other courses and will help the student in solving everyday problems. Additional treatment may be given to symbolic logic. Meets A.A. general educatio Category V. A writing emphasis course.|
|Special Requirements:||There is a fee for distance learning classes.|
|Program Learning Outcomes:||
The student should master the critical thinking skills inherent in informal logic. These skills should promote more careful, and clearer, thinking among students taking the course. The general course goal is to develop better thinkers who, more often than not, make sound decisions in their everyday lives. Global Learning Outcomes: I. CRITICAL THINKING: Students will evaluate the validity of their own and others' ideas through questioning, analyzing, and synthesizing results into the creative process. Some of these critical thinking skills will be developed through the following activities: A. Collect, organize, classify, correlate, analyze, and present materials and data from variety of academic disciplines and sources, distinguishing between facts and opinions, judgments and inferences, and the objective and subjective. The student may learn to identify logical fallacies through text examples and class discussion of argument forms. Examples of weak and strong argument forms are analyzed. B. Apply understanding and knowledge to define, analyze, and devise solutions for new and different problems and issues. The student may read lengthy arguments and write an analysis of each in essay form. Using the skills learned in distinguishing weak from strong arguments the student will test the arguments for cogency. C. Consciously raise questions, suspending judgment and remaining open to new information, methods, cultural systems, values, and beliefs. The student will explain their analysis of an argument cogency and will listen while others present their analysis looking for points of argument and differences in rational discourse. II. COMMUNICATION: Students will develop effective reading, writing, speaking and listening skills to communicate verbally and nonverbally on literal and figurative levels. Some of these communication skills will be developed through the following activities: A. Listen actively, partaking in dialogue with civility and respect for opposing viewpoints. The student will practice listening to opposing viewpoints and discuss differences and agreement in the form of rational discourse. C. Paraphrase ideas, distinguishing between fact and opinion. The student will analyze material for cogency and distinguish between objective evidence and subjective statements of belief. D. Use reading as a source of lifelong learning and enjoyment. The student may compose cogent arguments in essay form. VI. SOCIAL SKILLS: Students will develop and use skills and attitudes that integrate the individual into society. Some of these social skills will be developed through the following activities. A. Demonstrate appropriate social skills, language, and emotions in different situations, showing respect for others’ opinions. Students will discuss truth claims, their own and others recognizing a cogent argument is possible even though disagreement exists. B. Develop insight into his/her own and others’ behaviors and mental processes, accepting responsibility for his/her own actions. The student will learn to give consideration to an opposing argument reasonably presented. D. Work both alone and with others, understanding the roles of leadership and teamwork, to achieve goals. The student may learn that there is a difference between knowledge and belief and that a disagreement over evidence in a claim is not a personal assault.
|Course Learning Outcomes:||
Upon finishing the course, students should be able to recognize and criticize weak arguments and develop strong, sound or cogent arguments. Specifically, the student should be able to spot the most commonly committed fallacies (about 40 in number) and demonstrate their ability to compose a cogent argument (paper or other assignment). Additionally, students should emerge from the course with a basic understanding of epistemology.
|Methods of Evaluation:||Evaluation of student progress towards achieving the stated learning
outcomes and performance objectives is the responsibility of the
instructor, within the polices of the college and the department.
Detailed explanation is included in the expanded syllabus developed
by the instructor for each section being taught.
|Flexibility:||It is the intention of the instructor to accomplish the objectives specified in the course syllabus. However, circumstances may arise which prohibit the fulfilling of this endeavor. Therefore, this syllabus is subject to change. When possible, students will be notified of any change in advance of its occurrence.|
|Student Email Accounts||Pensacola State College provides an institutional email account to all credit students. Pirate Mail is the official method of communication, and students must use Pirate Mail when communicating with the College. In cases where companion software is used for a particular class, emails may be exchanged between instructor and student using the companion software.|
|Note:||For students with a disability that falls under the Americans with Disability Act or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, it is the responsibility of the student to notify Student Resource Center for ADA Services to discuss any special needs or equipment necessary to accomplish the requirements for this course. Upon completion of registration with the Student Resource Center for ADA Services office, specific arrangements can be discussed with the instructor.|